Skip to lesson
Exit
Capstone: Mock Loop1 / 3

1 min lesson

Part two: a defensible ROI model

Connect "Make every input an explicit, conservative assumption a CFO could challenge" to the decision you would make.

Step 1 of 3

Part two: a defensible ROI modelGrounded in assumed discovery numbers, stated as assumptions

Make every input an explicit, conservative assumption a CFO could challenge. The credibility is in showing your math and using their numbers, not in the size of the output.

Learn more

Advanced table

Net case = productivity value minus seat cost

Input
Engineers in scope
Assumption
150 (phase one)
Source
Discovery: platform + 3 product teams
Input
Fully-loaded cost / eng / yr
Assumption
$180,000
Source
Stated by VP Eng
Input
Time saved / eng / week
Assumption
2.5 hours (conservative)
Source
Their own pilot read, discounted
Input
Cursor cost / seat / yr
Assumption
Per published pricing
Source
List, pre-negotiation
Input
Year-1 productivity value
Assumption
~$1.6M (150 × $180K × 5% reclaimed)
Source
Model output, shown step by step

Net case = productivity value minus seat cost; lead with payback period, not gross value.

Pressure-test your own model

Before you present, halve every favorable assumption and check the case still clears. If your ROIReturn on Investment. The value gained versus what it cost, the language an economic buyer funds deals in. Press Enter for the full definition. only works at 4 hours saved per week, it's not defensible - a skeptical VP will run it at 1 hour and watch it collapse. State the conservative version as your base case and keep the upside as upside. "Even at one hour a week, payback is under a quarter" is a sentence that survives the room.

Learn more

Optional practice

Practice: Part two: a defensible ROI model

QYour ROIReturn on Investment. The value gained versus what it cost, the language an economic buyer funds deals in. Press Enter for the full definition. model shows a $3M year-one value, but it assumes 5 hours saved per engineer per week. The work-trial reviewer is a skeptical ex-CFO. What should you change before presenting?