Skip to lesson
Exit
Behavioral, Values & 'Why Cursor'1 / 2

2 min lesson

Three flavors of conflict, three different moves

Use two rows in "Three flavors of conflict, three different moves" to state the practical decision rules.

Step 1 of 2

Three flavors of conflict, three different movesMatch the move to the conflict

Conflict type
In the room (a panelist pushes)
The move
Hold your view with reasoning; concede gracefully if they're right
What it signals
Truth-seeking, intellectual honesty
Conflict type
Customer (hard truth needed)
The move
Name the truth, protect the relationship, give a path forward
What it signals
Customer obsession with a spine
Conflict type
Internal (Sales vs. CS, customer vs. roadmap)
The move
Surface the shared goal and trade off explicitly toward it
What it signals
Cross-functional humility

Customer conflict is the heart of the ADM job. The renewal is on the line precisely because you have to tell a VP of Engineering that adoption stalled and the reason is their phased rollout sequencing, not the product.

Say it like this

"Their CTO wanted to blame low adoption on the tool. The data said otherwise: the teams who'd configured .cursor/rules and run the enablement sessions were at 70% weekly active, the ones who skipped onboarding were at 12%. I showed him both cohorts in the EBR and said the rollout design was the gap, not Cursor. He didn't love hearing it, but we rebuilt the plan together and the account renewed and expanded."

That answer works because the spine and the obsession are both visible. You didn't soften the truth to keep him comfortable and you didn't deliver it as a gotcha. You brought data, owned the joint plan and the number moved.