2 min lesson
Have a take on where it's going
Look at both sides of "Have a take on where it's going" and name the signal that decides which one fits.
Step 1 of 3
Have a take on where it's going
The role rewards a distinctive, evidenced point of view. You don't need to be right about the future - you need a thesis you can defend with first-hand evidence and update when the evidence changes.
- Pick a thesis you actually believe - for example, that more work shifts to background agents reviewed as diffs or that the editor stays central because verification needs a human-readable surface.
- Ground it in something you've used and observed, not in a tweet you skimmed.
- State the conditions that would change your mind; truth-seekers hold opinions loosely and update in public.
Interactive diagram. Tab through its regions; each focused region shows its detail in the panel below.
Same question - 'why Cursor over Copilot?' - answered two ways. The left earns trust; the right loses it.
Learn more
Full explanation
Full explanation
Walk in with one comparison you can make in detail and one thesis about the future you can defend. When asked 'how do you think about Copilot,' give the competitor its due, make a specific Cursor claim and offer a workflow that demonstrates it. Neutrality reads as not having used the tools; a fair, opinionated, evidenced take reads as the power user Cursor is hiring.
Learn more
Optional practice