Skip to lesson
Exit
Governance, compliance & Cursor's control plane1 / 4

2 min lesson

Security's seats in the SDLC + vetting Cursor itself

Walk through the important items in "Security's seats in the SDLC + vetting Cursor itself" and give the practical point of each.

Step 1 of 4

A CISOChief Information Security Officer. The executive who owns security; usually the hardest and most important person to win over. Press Enter for the full definition. doesn't evaluate your tool in a vacuum. They run a security-in-the-SDLC program with specific gates and a vendor risk process aimed at you. Speak to both:

  • Cursor sits upstream of the existing gates. Its changes still pass SASTStatic Application Security Testing. Scanning source code for vulnerabilities without running it. In AI-heavy workflows it is the automated gate that reads every generated diff before a human does. Press Enter for the full definition., DASTDynamic Application Security Testing. Probing a running application for vulnerabilities from the outside, the way an attacker would. Complements SAST, which reads the code instead of poking the app. Press Enter for the full definition., SCASoftware Composition Analysis. Scanning third-party dependencies for known vulnerabilities and license problems. Press Enter for the full definition., secrets scanning, SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials. A list of every component and dependency in a build, like an ingredients label for software. Press Enter for the full definition. and build provenance checks, just like human-written code.
  • Cursor itself goes through third-party risk review. Answer with current evidence for security certifications, data handling, access controls and auditability, and recheck perishable details before promising them.
Learn more

Advanced table

Gate

Gate
SASTStatic Application Security Testing. Scanning source code for vulnerabilities without running it. In AI-heavy workflows it is the automated gate that reads every generated diff before a human does. Press Enter for the full definition.
What it checks
Static analysis of source for vulns (injection, unsafe APIs)
Why AI doesn't change the gate
Runs on the diff regardless of author; AI code is scanned like any code
Gate
DASTDynamic Application Security Testing. Probing a running application for vulnerabilities from the outside, the way an attacker would. Complements SAST, which reads the code instead of poking the app. Press Enter for the full definition.
What it checks
Dynamic testing of the running app
Why AI doesn't change the gate
Behavior-based; agnostic to authorship
Gate
SCASoftware Composition Analysis. Scanning third-party dependencies for known vulnerabilities and license problems. Press Enter for the full definition.
What it checks
Software composition - known CVEs in dependencies
Why AI doesn't change the gate
Catches risky deps an agent might pull in
Gate
Secrets scanning
What it checks
Hardcoded keys/tokens in the diff
Why AI doesn't change the gate
Critical backstop; pairs with Cursor secret-redaction
Gate
SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials. A list of every component and dependency in a build, like an ingredients label for software. Press Enter for the full definition.
What it checks
Software Bill of Materials - inventory of components
Why AI doesn't change the gate
Supply-chain transparency, required by many enterprises
Gate
SLSASupply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts. A framework for proving how a piece of software was built and that it wasn't tampered with. Press Enter for the full definition. / provenance
What it checks
Tamper-evident proof of how the artifact was built
Why AI doesn't change the gate
Attests the build pipeline, not the editor
The point to make

Every one of these gates operates on the change, not the author. AI-assisted code passes through the identical SASTStatic Application Security Testing. Scanning source code for vulnerabilities without running it. In AI-heavy workflows it is the automated gate that reads every generated diff before a human does. Press Enter for the full definition./DASTDynamic Application Security Testing. Probing a running application for vulnerabilities from the outside, the way an attacker would. Complements SAST, which reads the code instead of poking the app. Press Enter for the full definition./SCASoftware Composition Analysis. Scanning third-party dependencies for known vulnerabilities and license problems. Press Enter for the full definition./secrets/SBOMSoftware Bill of Materials. A list of every component and dependency in a build, like an ingredients label for software. Press Enter for the full definition./SLSASupply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts. A framework for proving how a piece of software was built and that it wasn't tampered with. Press Enter for the full definition. gauntlet. Adopting Cursor requires zero weakening of their security pipeline. It slots in upstream of all of it.

Learn more

Optional practice

Practice: Security's seats in the SDLC + vetting Cursor itself