1 min lesson
Close with discovery questions
Explain why specific discovery questions produce a better next step than a general request for questions.
Step 1 of 2
Close with discovery questions
Do not rely only on "Any questions?" Ask about the buyer's constraints, control owners and pilot measures. The answers give you a specific next step and make the follow-up useful.
- "Where does code review bottleneck today? Is it reviewer availability or the size of changes?"
- "Who owns the merge gate and what evidence does your audit team need to see on every PR?"
- "How much damage can one bad change cause? Which repositories or modules would you block first with an allowlist?"
- "If you ran a pilot, which metric would make your VP approve expansion? Would it be cycle time, change failure rate or onboarding time?"
- "Why did the last tool fail? Was it the security review, senior pushback or bad code?"
Learn more
Advanced table
How FE and FDE interviews differ
How FE and FDE interviews differKnow which role is being assessed
- Dimension
- Center of gravity
- Field Engineer, FE
- Demo, objection handling, persona translation
- Forward-Deployed Engineer, FDE
- Hands-in-the-repo implementation at the customer
- Dimension
- Interview proves
- Field Engineer, FE
- Can you make the room believe + name controls
- Forward-Deployed Engineer, FDE
- Can you ship real change in a hostile legacy codebase
- Dimension
- The demo is...
- Field Engineer, FE
- The main exercise. Explain, demonstrate and close
- Forward-Deployed Engineer, FDE
- The starting point before implementation work
- Dimension
- Failure mode they probe
- Field Engineer, FE
- Claims without evidence or weak objection handling
- Forward-Deployed Engineer, FDE
- Difficulty working in legacy code or applying controls
- Dimension
- Strongest signal
- Field Engineer, FE
- Clear objection handling and a concise point of view
- Forward-Deployed Engineer, FDE
- Strong delivery, DORADORA metrics. Four widely-used delivery measures: deployment frequency, lead time for changes, change failure rate and time to restore service. Press Enter for the full definition. and ITGCIT General Controls. The baseline IT controls auditors check: who can change what, how changes get approved and how systems are run. Press Enter for the full definition. reasoning in real code
| Dimension | Field Engineer, FE | Forward-Deployed Engineer, FDE |
|---|---|---|
| Center of gravity | Demo, objection handling, persona translation | Hands-in-the-repo implementation at the customer |
| Interview proves | Can you make the room believe + name controls | Can you ship real change in a hostile legacy codebase |
| The demo is... | The main exercise. Explain, demonstrate and close | The starting point before implementation work |
| Failure mode they probe | Claims without evidence or weak objection handling | Difficulty working in legacy code or applying controls |
| Strongest signal | Clear objection handling and a concise point of view | Strong delivery, DORADORA metrics. Four widely-used delivery measures: deployment frequency, lead time for changes, change failure rate and time to restore service. Press Enter for the full definition. and ITGCIT General Controls. The baseline IT controls auditors check: who can change what, how changes get approved and how systems are run. Press Enter for the full definition. reasoning in real code |
In an FE loop, the demo is the main deliverable. Interviewers watch how you frame the problem, name controls and answer a skeptical question.
In an FDE loop, the demo is only the start. Interviewers also test whether you can make and maintain a controlled change in legacy code.
In either loop, explain the work in order and name the control at each step.
"Before I tell you what I'd build, what would make your VP say yes? I'd rather solve that problem than demo something you do not need."