1 min lesson
Managed service or self-hosted runner
Put this idea into your own words. "Managed service compared with a self-hosted runner."
Step 1 of 2
Managed service compared with a self-hosted runner
When a buyer compares Cursor automations with an open-source runner such as OpenClaw, compare operating responsibility directly. Cursor provides cloud execution, repository navigation, artifacts and product controls. A self-hosted runner gives the customer more control over its setup, while the customer also owns the machine, integration, security and maintenance.
"When you compare Cursor with a self-hosted runner, start with responsibility. Cursor provides managed cloud execution, repository navigation, artifacts and product controls. With a self-hosted runner, you control the setup and own the machine, security, integrations and maintenance."
Do not dismiss self-hosting. A customer may need that control or already have the staff to operate it. Compare responsibilities and constraints without assuming one model fits every team.
A Cloud Agent run takes minutes because it works in the background and sends a notification when done. Builds (August 2026) prepare the environment in the background at no extra cost, and Cursor reports about 10x faster boot and about 3x faster time to first token. Describe the workflow as asynchronous by design, not as instant.