1 min lesson
Mock coding under confirmed constraints
Match each case in "Mock coding under confirmed constraints" to the signal and response that fit it.
Step 1 of 3
The posting says there are 2–3 short technicals, but it does not publish their topics or tool rules. Before practising, ask recruiting about the timebox, editor, autocomplete, chat and other AI assistance. Rehearse with that exact setup.
Pick one editor-flavored problem as a role-relevant drill and use the confirmed timebox. If tools are restricted, solve with only the permitted setup. If AI is allowed, review and test every generated change. In either mode, keep your reasoning clear enough for another person to follow.
Learn more
Full explanation
Role-relevant drill
interface Edit { start: number; // inclusive char offset end: number; // exclusive char offset text: string; // replacement } function applyEdits(source: string, edits: Edit[]): string { // Reject overlaps up front; they make the result ambiguous. const sorted = [...edits].sort((a, b) => a.start - b.start); for (let i = 1; i < sorted.length; i++) { if (sorted[i].start < sorted[i - 1].end) { throw new Error("overlapping edits are not applicable"); } } // Apply from the end so each splice can't shift an earlier edit's offsets. let out = source; for (let i = sorted.length - 1; i >= 0; i--) { const e = sorted[i]; out = out.slice(0, e.start) + e.text + out.slice(e.end); } return out; }
Whether you write the code directly or use permitted assistance, you should be able to explain why it sorts descending, why it rejects overlaps, what its complexity is and how you would change it for a much larger buffer.
Learn more
Optional practice
Test yourself on Mock coding under confirmed constraints
QWhen applying a list of edits (start, end, replacement) to a buffer, why apply them in descending position order?