Skip to lesson
Exit
The Interview Loop1 / 2

1 min lesson

This round previews the job

Consider this situation: "The challenge prompt is 'figure out why developers churn after the first week.' What is the first move in your plan and what is the panel watching for?" Start with the decision, then the evidence.

Step 1 of 2

  1. 1Sharpen the question first. Restate the vague prompt as the specific decision the study unblocks before choosing any method.
  2. 2Pick generative or evaluative out loud. Name which it is, then choose the method that fits and say what you rejected.
  3. 3Scope to the team's pace. Design a study that ships insight in weeks, with a stretch version if there were more time.
  4. 4State expected outcomes up front. Map each possible result to the decision it would drive, so the work is decision-led.
  5. 5Defend, then update. Hold your choices under panel pushback and visibly revise when a critique is right.
This round previews the job

Designing a good-enough study fast and defending it to skeptical researchers is the daily work of this seat. The challenge round is the closest the loop gets to watching you do the job, which is why it carries the most weight. Module 5 is a full deep dive on it.

Don't gold-plate past the time-box

A flawless eight-method program on a few-days take-home reads as a pace risk, not diligence. Scope to the decision, ship a plan a team could run next week and let a short 'with more time' section carry your ambition. Pace is a screened value here.