Skip to lesson
Exit
Mixed Methods & Quant Literacy1 / 3

1 min lesson

Qualitative rigor that holds up

Say what this means in practice: "Rigor here is not academic ceremony."

Step 1 of 3

Anyone can run interviews. The methods panel is checking whether your qual would survive a skeptical staff engineer reading the transcript next to your claim.

Cursor's users are professional developers who can smell a leading question and will tell you their workaround instead of their real problem. Rigor here is not academic ceremony. It is the chain you can show from a raw quote to a coded theme to the recommendation you put in front of a PM, with the bias-control choices visible at each step.

Learn more

Advanced table

Reference table

Instead of
“Would faster autocomplete make you more productive?”
Ask
“Walk me through the last time autocomplete got in your way.”
Why
Hypotheticals invite agreement; a recalled episode surfaces real friction.
Instead of
“Do you like the agent feature?”
Ask
“The last time you used the agent, what did you do right after it finished?”
Why
Opinion questions reward politeness; behavior questions reward truth.
Instead of
“How often do you review AI-generated code?”
Ask
“Open the last PR where you accepted a suggestion. What did you check?”
Why
Frequency self-reports are guesses; an artifact anchors them to reality.

Trade opinion and hypothesis questions for recalled, specific episodes tied to an artifact.

Once you have a behavior, ladder to the why. Each answer earns one more “what made that matter to you?” until you hit a value or a constraint, not another feature request.

Learn more

Optional practice

Practice: Qualitative rigor that holds up

QA PM asks you to validate that a planned feature will boost productivity. You only have time for five interviews. Which opening question best fits a rigorous qual approach?