ACP for Editor and Custom Client Integrations
ACP (Agent Client Protocol) lets another editor drive the same Cursor CLI agent loop through its own front-end.
Use the right surface
After this you can pick ACP for the right job and define done.
Done means you can say when to run the CLI as the ACPAgent Client Protocol. An open standard that lets any IDE host any coding agent; Cursor uses it to run inside JetBrains/IntelliJ and Android Studio. bridge behind the client editor and name the local controls the session still enforces.

The same agent loop can run in a terminal, script, CI job or SDK-backed internal tool.
Use ACPAgent Client Protocol. An open standard that lets any IDE host any coding agent; Cursor uses it to run inside JetBrains/IntelliJ and Android Studio. when a custom editor, client or workflow wants to use Cursor agent capabilities. Keep the boundary narrow.
Start small. Name the job, attach the context that proves the point and decide what evidence would make the output trustworthy.
Read the loop before touching the controls. The first beat frames the work, the second uses Cursor, the third checks the result and the fourth leaves a handoff someone else can inspect.
Interactive diagram. Tab through its regions; each focused region shows its detail in the panel below.
Run this loop in a real repo.
- Entry point
- Cursor CLICursor's command line: the full agent, all modes and models, in the terminal and pipeable into scripts and CI. ACPAgent Client Protocol. An open standard that lets any IDE host any coding agent; Cursor uses it to run inside JetBrains/IntelliJ and Android Studio. bridge
- Source
- CLI ACPAgent Client Protocol. An open standard that lets any IDE host any coding agent; Cursor uses it to run inside JetBrains/IntelliJ and Android Studio. docs
Use the source as the product reference.
Ask Cursor for an output you can inspect.
If the output cannot be checked, narrow the task before you continue.
A good run leaves a file, setting, screenshot, command result or written claim you can verify.
Takeaway. Done means you can say when to run the CLI as the ACPAgent Client Protocol. An open standard that lets any IDE host any coding agent; Cursor uses it to run inside JetBrains/IntelliJ and Android Studio. bridge behind the client editor and name the local controls the session still enforces.
Self-check
QWhen should you reach for ACPAgent Client Protocol. An open standard that lets any IDE host any coding agent; Cursor uses it to run inside JetBrains/IntelliJ and Android Studio.?
Run it
After this you can do the task with clear scope and one proof point.
Treat this as a short practice loop, not a product tour. The task should be small enough that you can inspect the result without trusting the summary.
In Android Studio's AI chat: install the Cursor agent from the ACP registry.Confirm carry-over: open a rule, check the MCP servers and the model picker.The exercise is complete only when the proof matches the requested outcome. If the proof is weak, reduce the scope or fix the context instead of adding more instructions.
Keep the task small enough to review.
The agent loop respects local controls.
Takeaway. Stop when you have proof: The client connects to the intended workspace..
Self-check
QWhich habit makes this workflow safe to use on a real project?
Check it
After this you can find the first failed check before changing tools.
Verification decides the next move.
Interactive diagram. Tab through its regions; each focused region shows its detail in the panel below.
Pick a row to see what to look for.
Use the first failure signal as the next prompt. Broad retries usually make the run noisier; a narrow retry gives Cursor a concrete repair target.
No proof means more checking.
Use a real repo or admin setting. Save the prompt, context and proof.
Takeaway. If it fails, find the first failed check.
Self-check
QThe workflow failed. What is the best first move?