Project Rules and AGENTS.md
Put durable instructions where every run can find them.
Use the right surface
After this you can pick Rules for the right job and define done.
Done means the correction becomes a durable instruction instead of repeated prompt text.
Durable workflows live in scoped rules, skills, hooks and approved MCP tools.
Use Rules when you keep correcting Cursor about the same repo convention. Keep the boundary narrow.
Start small. Name the job, attach the context that proves the point and decide what evidence would make the output trustworthy.
Read the loop before touching the controls. The first beat frames the work, the second uses Cursor, the third checks the result and the fourth leaves a handoff someone else can inspect.
Interactive diagram. Tab through its regions; each focused region shows its detail in the panel below.
Run this loop in a real repo.
- Entry point
- Rules settings and repository AGENTS.md
- Source
- Rules docs and working-with-agents guidance
Use the source as the product reference.
Ask Cursor for an output you can inspect.
If the output cannot be checked, narrow the task before you continue.
A good run leaves a file, setting, screenshot, command result or written claim you can verify.
Takeaway. Done means the correction becomes a durable instruction instead of repeated prompt text.
Self-check
QWhen should you reach for Rules?
Run it
After this you can do the task with clear scope and one proof point.
Treat this as a short practice loop, not a product tour. The task should be small enough that you can inspect the result without trusting the summary.
- 1Identify a repeated correction or repo convention.
- 2Decide whether it is personal, project-level or team-level.
- 3Write the rule close to the code or workflow it governs.
- 4Test it with a small agent run and inspect whether behavior changed.
The exercise is complete only when the proof matches the requested outcome. If the proof is weak, reduce the scope or fix the context instead of adding more instructions.
Keep the task small enough to review.
The rule belongs at the right scope.
Takeaway. Stop when you have proof: The rule is specific and easy to verify..
Self-check
QWhich habit makes this workflow safe to use on a real project?
Check it
After this you can find the first failed check before changing tools.
Verification decides the next move.
Interactive diagram. Tab through its regions; each focused region shows its detail in the panel below.
Pick a row to see what to look for.
Use the first failure signal as the next prompt. Broad retries usually make the run noisier; a narrow retry gives Cursor a concrete repair target.
No proof means more checking.
Use a real repo or admin setting. Save the prompt, context and proof.
Takeaway. If it fails, find the first failed check.
Self-check
QThe workflow failed. What is the best first move?